Sanjay, 666, Incest, Satan, & Alleged Christian Sciptures

Sanjay Kishore Dadlani:
Middlesex University Student Residing In The UK

Just recently, Sanjay published an amusing blog-entry about Sathya Sai Baba being “born of incest” and cited an alleged biblical passage (taken from the fictional horror movie “Lost Souls”) that alluded to a man being born of incest that would eventually become Satan. The relevant quote that Sanjay cited was:

A man born of incest Will become Satan. And the world as we know it Will be no more. (Deuteronomy 17)

Apparently, Sanjay is completely unaware that this alleged Biblical quote does not exist. Any person (with even the most remedial knowledge of the Bible) knows that the quote ascribed to Deuteronomy 17 bears no resemblance to any passage in the 5th book of the Pentateuch, or any other section in the canon. The Deuteronomy quote, cited from the horror movie “Lost Souls”, is a fictional quote. Therefore, Sanjay’s reference to this quote thoroughly negates any and all inferences he attempted to draw from it.

Sanjay also felt it was important to publish this post on 6-6-06. This is of little surprise considering Sanjay’s Satanic Inclinations and reading of the Satanic Bible due to his “seriously contemplating on and accepting the possibility of the darker forces in life”.

Sanjay attempted to argue that since Sathya Sai Baba’s father and mother were “cousins”, Baba was “born of incest”, and therefore is the “Satan” alluded to in the non-existent Deuteronomy 17 passage.

Incest is sex between closely related family members: Reference. In Kasturi’s Sathyam Shivam Sundaram (published in 1961), it specifically stated that:

He (Kodama) desired to bring his distant relatives, Subba Raju and family, nearer to Puttaparthi…

Therefore, although Sai Baba’s father and mother were distantly related, this does not constitute, by definition, “incest”. Leave it to Sanjay, the stalking and deviant porn pervert, to redefine the word “incest” to suit his defamatory campaigns against Sathya Sai Baba.

There are several interesting observations that can be made about Sanjay’s poorly researched and puerile article against Sathya Sai Baba. First of all, Sanjay attempted to argue against incest by citing the Bible. This was Sanjay’s first mistake.

The Bible is full of incest. Examples: Milcah (the sister of Lot) married her uncle Nahor; Lot’s two daughters got their father drunk, had sex with him and give birth to his children; In one of the stories about Abraham, Sarah is his half sister (in Rabbinic literature, Sarah is Abraham’s neice); Isaac married his second cousin Rebekah; Esau married two of his first cousins (the sisters Mahalath and Basemath); Jacob marries two of his first cousins daughters of his mother’s brother; Laban; Judah mistakes his daughter-in-law Tamar for a prostitute and impregnates her; Amram married his paternal aunt; Zelophehad’s five daughters married their cousins on their father’s side; Adam and Eve’s children had to engage in sex with each other in order to populate the Earth; and Amnon rapes his beautiful half-sister Tamar.

Secondly, Sanjay is a Hare Krishna wannabee. In scriptures that Sanjay defends, Lord Krishna is alleged to have lived in incest with his sister Subhadra (sharing her with his brother Balarama). The Rig Veda mentioned that the “Vedic Pushan is the lover of his sister”. There are stories about how Lord Krishna’s 16,000 drunken wives (yes, all allegedly married to one person) were ready to commit incest with Krishna’s son, Samba. As a result of this incident, Lord Krishna cursed Samba to be afflicted with leprosy (how compassionate) and cursed his 16,000 wives to be carried off by barbarians after his death (which allegedly happened right before Arjuna’s eyes). There are also references to Agni having sex with his sister and that Agni was born from the union of his father and his father’s sister. Then there is Lord Brahma’s incest with his daughter Saraswati.

Far be it for Sanjay to argue against incest when both his scriptures and the Bible are full of incest. Far be it for Sanjay to argue against incest when he doesn’t even know the proper definition for “incest”! And far be it for Sanjay to infer that Sathya Sai Baba is Satan by citing a non-existent passage from Deuteronomy 17!

Just when one would think this could not get even more ridiculous, Sanjay is a confirmed Jesus Sex Fetishist who was caught, with his pants down, requesting (of all things) Jesus Pornography and attempted (admittedly) to get more sex with women by trying to look like Jesus Christ (Reference)!

This is the pervert who is citing non-existent Biblical passages and is trying to use Christian concepts against Sathya Sai Baba (although Sanjay is not a Christian)! Furthermore, there is little doubt that Christians would consider Sanjay Dadlani an idolator and a heathen (as he worships doll-deities that he considers to be God Incarnate on his altar)! These same Christian Scriptures put Sanjay is a very tenuous and abominable position himself.

Such is the “exposer” of Sathya Sai Baba. The only time Sanjay opens his mouth is to stick his other foot in it.

RELATED BLOG LINKS:
» » The Angel Of Death: Azra`iL
» » Sanjay’s Satanic Inclinations
» » Sanjay And The Satanic Bible
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment

  1. Anonymous
    Posted April 16, 2007 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Marriage between cousins is a very common practice in India. Whomever this idiot is who claimed otherwise is insulting millions of Hindus although he appears to be Hindu himself. Some educated links that explain marriages in India more in depth…

    Marriage rules and India marriages.