On the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia Talk Page, Robert Priddy said:
SSS108 (Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno) is an extremely active pro-Sai activist with four pro-Sai websites containing altogether many hundreds of pages pushing his POV wholly one-sidedly (as witnessed here on Wikipedia) as he also does on several blogs and numerous bulletin boards, most especially and in sexually-explicit language on Yahoo Groups sathyasaibaba2. (Reference).
Secondly, Robert Priddy accused me of using “sexually-explicit language on Yahoo Groups sathyasaibab2″. Why doesn’t Priddy cite examples? I am not aware of using any kind of “sexually explicit” language on the SSB2 Yahoo Group. I most certainly have quoted obscene, vulgar and “sexually explicit” language from Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (whose “sexually explicit” language Priddy has never complained about).
Priddy also does not complain about his 3 Anti-Sai Sites, Sanjay’s 22 blogs, Reinier’s 17 sites and their numerous and wholly one-sided posts on the internet numbering in the thousands! I don’t see Priddy complaining about Barry Pittard “numerous posts” on bulletin boards and forums. In Priddy’s dictatorial world, only Anti-Sai Activists are entitled to express their views and others are not. Sounds rather cultish, if you ask me.
Come on Mr. Priddles, back up your comments for once!
|RELATED BLOG LINKS:
Lies Relating To Wikipedia:
» » Robert Priddy’s Phony “Phone” Lies
» » Robert Priddy Sticks His Foot In His Mouth Again
» » Robert Priddy Literally Stumbles Onto The Scene
» » Another Not So Priddy Lie Exposed
» » Another Spiteful & Erroneous Lie
» » Robert Priddy Lies About Lisa De Witt
» » A Funny And Embarrassing Wikipedia Blunder
» » Another Example Of Priddy’s Poor Research